Contributions to the History of Determinants 1900-1920 by Sir Thomas Muir, D.Sc., LL.D., F.R.S., C.M.G.

By Sir Thomas Muir, D.Sc., LL.D., F.R.S., C.M.G.

Show description

Read or Download Contributions to the History of Determinants 1900-1920 PDF

Similar history_1 books

Allegory and Sexual Ethics in the High Middle Ages (The New Middle Ages)

Guynn bargains an cutting edge new method of the moral, cultural, and ideological research of medieval allegory. operating among poststructuralism and old materialism, he considers either the playfulness of allegory (its openness to a number of interpretations and views) and its disciplinary strength (the use of rhetoric to naturalize hegemonies and suppress distinction and dissent).

World Court Digest 2001 - 2005

The area courtroom Digest maintains the Fontes Iuris Gentium, a chain that offers the selections of the everlasting court docket of foreign Justice and the foreign court docket of Justice as much as 2000. the hot quantity covers the interval from 2001 to 2005. All very important pronouncements of the court docket in its judgments and advisory reviews are systematically prepared less than particular subject matters taken from major and procedural foreign legislation.

Additional resources for Contributions to the History of Determinants 1900-1920

Sample text

In his logic Toletus contrasted 'ens reale' with 'ens rationis', not 'intentionale' (1596, 'In librvm Categorivm', 'De praedicamentis in communi', qi, concl. 2, p. , q6, ai-2, pp. 137— 44). Ockham, as might be expected, denied that intentional being can be a species of real being: 'ilia species non habet esse intentionale vel spirituale, quia hoc dicere includit contradictionem, quia omne ens extra animam est vera et verum esse reale habet suo modo' (William of Ockham, Quaestiones in librum sententiarum, III, q2 (William of Ockham 1967-86, vol.

Op. omn. 3, pp. 722-38); Toletus 1596, 'In librum Porphyrii', q2 (p. 27b). , I q76 a5; q84 a7; q85 ai; q85 a3; and on Duns Scotus, Wolter 1990, chaps. 2, 5. These authors differed on whether knowledge pertains only to universals or includes particulars. 11 Thomas Aquinas 1968b; Duns Scotus, Super libros Aristotelis De anima (Duns Scotus 1891—95, vol. 3, pp. 472—642); Collegium Conimbricense 1600; Melanchthon, Liber de anima (Melanchthon 1834-60, vol. 13, pp. 5-178); Rubius 1620; Toletus 1594; Zabarella 1606.

1, qi a6 (pp. 62-3); q6 a2 (pp. 5, qi-6 (pp. 369-408); Eustachius a Sancto Paulo 1638, 'Physica', III. 1, disp. 1 q$ (p. 4, disp. 2 q7—8, 10 (pp. 4-5 (pp. 8 (Su. Op. omn. 3, pp. 7, q2i. , I q78 ai; q84 a6—7; 1968b [1984], q4, ad 1; Quaestiones disputatae de verilate, qio a6 ad 7 (Thomas Aquinas 1882- , vol. 22, p. 314a); Duns Scotus, De anima, qi7 (Duns Scotus 1891-5, vol. 3, pp. 58oa~582a); Ordinatio I, d3, pt. 3, q3 (Duns Scotus 1950—, vol. 3, pp. 330-8). Collegium Conimbricense 1607, pt. 2, 'De interpretatione', chap.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.19 of 5 – based on 16 votes